Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #32906
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Anupama,

    Those illustrations in video 30 are to compare the Vedic and conventional methods. In fact the solution of quadratics shown in this lesson is for when the coefficient of x^2 is 1, and in the illustration it is 3.

    We cover this fully in the Advanced course but since you ask let me explain.

    The next step is -50 divided by 13, which gives -4 remainder 2.

    The next step differs in that when we subtract the Duplex of -4 from 20 we have to treble it first so we have 20-48=-28 and -28 divided by 13 gives -3 remainder 11.

    Since you may ask why we say -28 divided by 13 gives -3 remainder 11 rather than -2 rem -2, this becomes clear once you start to proceed to the following step.

    in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #32873
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    That’s right Savita. I hope you have seen the full guidelines after lesson 26.

    in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #32872
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Shikha,

    There is a thread for week 8.

    in reply to: Assignment 2 #32871
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Seth, There must be plenty of such resources available on the internet and they can be adapted to whatever topic needs them.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #32846
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Amara,

    Actually no-one talks about remainders as far a square roots are concerned. I was trying to answer your question as best as I could. So I have explained about the remainders for 5229 in my reply above.

    I believe you can see your answers to the quizzes and which ones are wrong after the quiz is completed. For an explanation please post in the thread or contact me.

    in reply to: Week 8 Video lessons #32838
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Thanks Preeti.

    Yes, we can take a=2 rather than 3 and get the answer that way too.

    We cover this subject more fully in the Advanced Course.

    in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #32836
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    1. Yes, we go leftwards in pairs from the decimal point.

    2. I think you slipped up on this line:  D(4)=16, 60-14=46, 46/12=3r10

    The 14 should be 16.

    in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #32835
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    It is a perfect square because when the the remainder 3 is attached in the usual place we find 309 at the end of the number.

    And this is brought to zero by the remaining Duplexes: D(53) = 30 and D(3) = 9.

    in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #32754
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    In the first practice only one figure is required, so for 3000 for example you would just give 50.

    In the second practice two figures are required, so for 3000 you get 55.

    So yes the answers are different but the 2nd is more accurate than the 1st.

    in reply to: Challenge Questions – 2 #32701
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Challenge Question 18

    Missing Digits – Left to Right

    Use vertically and crosswise to find the missing digits:

    123 x ??? = 321??

    in reply to: Challenge Questions – 2 #32700
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Thanks for these answers – all correct

    Challenge Question 17

    There are certain whole numbers which divide into at least one of the elements of any perfect triple.

    For example, 2 is such a number as all triples have at least one even element.

    [We do not count triples that contain a zero, like 1,0,1]

    Can you find them?

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #32698
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    It gets a lot more complicated when you mix bases like this. When I looked into it I decided it was not worth the hassle.

    I think there is an article or two on this though in the Online Journal in my website.

    But I would suggest you use 8000 as base, not 7000, as then both numbers will be below a base  and your deficiency will be only 132.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #32681
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    It would be rather absurd to find 7868×9 using a base of 7000 as your deficiencies will both the large numbers, 868 and 6991.

    in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #32680
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    If you mean the number of pages, it should be about 4 Savita.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #32663
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Preeti,

    You are mixing your bases: 7000 and 10.
    You would need to multiply the LHS by 7 only if you use 7000 as base for both numbers.

    Good try though.

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 143 total)
Shopping Cart
error:
Scroll to Top