Forum Replies Created
June 19, 2021 at 6:51 pm in reply to: Week 4 Video lessons #36982
<sup>x2<sub>x4</sub></sup>March 24, 2021 at 5:11 pm in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #33393
I’m glad you both enjoyed the course Mallika. Thanks for the encouraging comments, I hope we meet again in a future course.March 23, 2021 at 4:43 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33381
No, there is no need to send a recording Savita.March 22, 2021 at 4:58 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33366
The Advanced course starts in one week – on 29th March.
You will hear shortly regarding assignments.March 21, 2021 at 1:53 am in reply to: Assignment 2 #33342
These points were addressed. There is not really any minimum age: at the beginning the child simply enjoys having fun with numbers, the more specific methods taught in this course can be started around age 8 years. I also mentioned about Vera Stevens.
The confusion you mention was explained in lesson 9. For a young child teaching should not be by rote – if it is approached as a fun activity it will be accepted gladly. The rigid approach to teaching must go – there is no right or wrong way.March 16, 2021 at 11:46 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33193
In the list of lessons, just before lesson 1 there is a link “VM-Download Materials”.
The template can be downloaded from there, it’s at the top of the list.March 16, 2021 at 4:49 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33188
It will be at least another week before the final results are published by the Pasyanthi Team.March 14, 2021 at 8:33 pm in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #33171
Yes, definitely Preeti.March 14, 2021 at 6:32 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33167
It’s an introduction to VM so aim to impress. Squaring numbers that end in 5, multiplying numbers near a base, division by 9, adding and subtacting fractions would be good alternatives (see lesson 20).March 14, 2021 at 6:05 pm in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #33166
I believe it is 2 weeks.March 13, 2021 at 7:24 am in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #33147
You would need to write it as 11 where the first 1 is a subscript.
Then you would carry it to the 2 once the calculation is completed.
But given 198 it would be easier to write it as 20(2).March 12, 2021 at 6:31 pm in reply to: Assignment 2 #33142
22nd March is the new deadline Shikha.March 12, 2021 at 5:06 pm in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #33139
It’s best not to apply bar digits here, but should still work out if you do.
You arrived at the end with 69(11).
This converts directly to 6889.
It is certainly worth experimenting with the bar numbers to become familiar and get an idea when to apply them.March 10, 2021 at 7:33 pm in reply to: Challenge Questions – 2 #33091
You have it, and summed it up perfectly with
‘So in triplet we can skip the element which is divisible by 3 and only take the digit sum of other elements’.March 9, 2021 at 8:30 pm in reply to: Week 9 Video Lessons #33085
That is ok Shikha. The angle is the same.
If you subtract them the other way around you will get 7,1,-.
It is usual to put the line with the steeper slope on the top.
If you think about it, the angle between two lines could be expressed by several angles.