Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 143 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Week 7 Video Lessons #32661
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Yes that is correct Fabio.

     

     

    in reply to: General Discussion of Vedic Maths #32584
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    Yes, that is a problem, and practice is part of the solution.

    At the beginning you were strongly advised to make notes as you go along. This helps in understanding and gives you a permanent record to which you can refer, as well as helping when doing the quizzes. You can still do that as the videos are available for at least a couple of weeks yet.

    in reply to: Week 7 Video Lessons #32578
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    y=mx+c is a standard form for straight lines. That is because by substituting specific values for m and c the equation always plots out to a straight, and all lines are inlcuded.
    The nice thing about y=mx+c is that it turns out that m is the gradient (slope) of the line, and c is the intercept on the y-axis.

    Another standard form for a straight line is ax+by=c, so y=mx+c is not the only one.

    in reply to: Week 7 Video Lessons #32573
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    Sri Bharati Krishna’s book does not mention this topic.

    Mathematics is a vast subject and the book cannot cover everything. James Glover’s discovery directly relates to the Vedic Sutras and is simple and easy to understand. Hence we can include it as Vedic Maths.

    in reply to: Week 7 Video Lessons #32571
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    There is only one line and one equation.

    2x+5y=14 is exactly equivalent to -2x-5y=-14 mathematically.

    One equation – one line.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #32568
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    That’s right Preeti. It’s brilliant the way that the Duplex automatically collects up similar terms.

    in reply to: Assignment 1 #32056
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    2a<sup>2</sup>b<sub>3</sub>

    in reply to: Assignment 1 #32055
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    x<sub>2</sub>y<sup>3</sup>

    in reply to: Exploring Division #32053
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Savita,

    It’s good you are exploring like this. It is like in ordinary life, we are prepared to make the adjustments we need to make the problem easy or manageable.

    Anupama’s method for this particular division is probably as good as it gets. But for the divison by 118 you could use 12 as divisor witj (2) on the flag.

    Or, you could halve both 847 and 236 (saves the halving at the end).
    Or you could double 236 and work with a divisor of 5.

    The reverse multiplication method will work too.

    in reply to: Assignment 1 #32041
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Test messsage

    in reply to: Exploring Division #31901
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Yes, that’s an excellent method Anupama.

    in reply to: Exploring Multiplication #31796
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Thanks Anupama, this is impressive.

    These special methods give us a huge range of possibilities, and inspire creativity in the classroom.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #31727
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Yes, that looks great Mallika. Well done.

    in reply to: Week 6 Video Lessons #31684
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Hi Mallika,

    c is good. You get take a triple from 180 degrees most easily by just changing the sign of the first element.
    Actually I forgot that triple subtraction comes up later in the book (in VMTTC we come to it in lesson 34), so my advice was not the best. I should have said to drop a perpendicular from M onto AB, call that point P. Then angle PMA is clearly 5,4,- and the required angle is double that.

    For d I’m not sure of your method, though your answer is right.
    My advice would be to draw DB, then you can take 4,2,- from 1,1,- (the triple for 45 degrees), and then double.

    in reply to: Exploring Multiplication #31677
    KennethWilliams
    Keymaster

    Thanks Anupama. Can you explain how 11 x 56 can be done by all the the 6 methods.

    For 65 x 85 you can double them both and find 13×17 using By One More, put two zeros on and halve twice.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 143 total)
Shopping Cart
error:
Scroll to Top